discussion is prevailing because up until this point one of the boastfully US grading companies PCGS has labelled these Wedding set coins as normal circulation quality, albeit giving them the top numbers of MS67, MS68, MS69 or MS70, something not normally possible for standard coins from the production presses. Their magnificence and apparently perfective assume played them to be something special but this hasn ’ metric ton been recognised by the TPG. Collectors have insisted they should be given the specimen prefix of SP by the third party grader to identify that the wedding laid coins are of ranking quality .
now some stimulation by the production developer at the Royal Australian Mint in Canberra has shed more light on the process of producing the Wedding Set coins in what they have termed jewel uncirculated finish. This is what Mr Dion Buck had to say :
Our term for the wedding set finish up until 2009 ( iodine think that was when it finished as gem and went to proof in 2010 ) was Gem Uncirculated. other parties may refer to this finish as specimen, this term is subject to a short discrepancy in meaning across the industry but is by and large approriate i guess, but I ’ ll explain the nature of our term Gem Uncirculated.
The dies for these coins were polished to the same choice as proof dies, however no frost was applied – to maintain the uncirculated appearance.
The proof polishing march is highly labor intensive, done by hand with bantam tools under binocular microscopes. The blanks used for Gem Uncirculated coins were proofread blanks, of a higher quality than circ/unc blanks. The lacuna formulation process for proof coins was besides followed, which uses a variety show of techniques to purify, or clear the blank surface of defects ( pickling, buff, heat discussion and so forth ). last the coins were struck as per proof mint process, on a validation press, hand loaded and inspected, struck four times precisely, and then encapsulated. These coins were absolutely unique, and while I never got around to asking all purchasers, I had a reasonably strong inkling that more collectors bought this set, than wedding go-ers.
My opinion from reading this process is that they should be given the specimen label as they are in truth not standard off the production press method of industry. They are particularly made in a process not dissimilar to that of the proof coins, and while not proof coins, they deserve a different tag to those bog down standard in-your-change coins .