The Changing Racial and Ethnic Composition of the U.S. Electorate

The Changing Racial and Ethnic Composition of the U.S. Electorate

In battleground states, Hispanics grew more than other racial or ethnic groups as a share of eligible voters

The approaching 2020 presidential election has drawn renewed attention to how demographic shifts across the United States have changed the composition of the electorate .
For this data essay, we analyzed national and state-level shifts in the racial and ethnic constitution of the United States electorate between 2000 and 2018, with a focus on cardinal battlefield states in the approaching 2020 election. The analysis is primarily based on data from the U.S. Census Bureau ’ sulfur American Community Survey and the 2000 U.S. decennial census provided through Integrated Public Use Microdata Series ( IPUMS ) from the University of Minnesota.

See hera to read the data essay ’ s methodology for far details on our data sources .
Eligible voters refer to persons ages 18 and older who are U.S. citizens. They make up the voting-eligible population or electorate. The terms eligible voters, voting eligible, the electorate and voters are used interchangeably in this report .
Registered voters are eligible voters who have completed all the documentations necessary to vote in an upcoming election.
Voter turnout refers to the number of people who say they voted in a given election .
Voter turnout rate refers to the contribution of eligible voters who say they voted in a given election .
Naturalized citizens  are lawful permanent residents who have fulfilled the length of stay and other requirements to become U.S. citizens and who have taken the oath of citizenship .
The terms Latino and Hispanic are used interchangeably in this report. Hispanics are of any race .
References to Asians, Blacks and Whites are single-race and refer to the non-Hispanic components of those populations .
Battleground states include Arizona, Florida, Michigan, North Carolina, Pennsylvania and Wisconsin. These states were identified by Pew Research Center using ratings from a diverseness of sources, see the methodology for more details .
In all 50 states, the share of non-Hispanic White eligible voters declined between 2000 and 2018, with 10 states experiencing double-digit drops in the share of White eligible voters. During that same period, spanish american voters have come to make up increasingly larger shares of the electorate in every state. These gains are particularly boastfully in the Southwestern U.S., where states like Nevada, California and Texas have seen rapid emergence in the Hispanic plowshare of the electorate over an 18-year menstruation. These trends are besides peculiarly noteworthy in battlefield states – such as Florida and Arizona – that are likely to be crucial in deciding the 2020 election. In Florida, two-in-ten eligible voters in 2018 were Hispanic, about double the share in 2000. And in the emerging battlefield country of Arizona, Hispanic adults made up about one-fourth ( 24 % ) of all eligible voters in 2018, up 8 share points since 2000 .

To be sure, the demographic composition of an area does not tell the wholly fib. Patterns in voter registration and voter output vary widely by rush and ethnicity, with White adults historically more likely to be registered to vote and to turn out to vote than other racial and ethnic groups. additionally, every presidential election brings its own singular set of circumstances, from the personal characteristics of the candidates, to the economy, to historic events such as a ball-shaped pandemic. still, understanding the changing racial and ethnic typography in key states helps to provide clues for how political winds may shift over time .

Black, Hispanic and Asian registered voters historically lean Democratic

The ways in which these demographic shifts might shape electoral outcomes are closely linked to the distinct partisan preferences of different racial and cultural groups. Pew Research Center sketch data spanning more than two decades shows that the Democratic Party maintains a wide and long-standing advantage among Black, Hispanic and asian American registered voters. Among White voters, the enthusiast balance has been broadly stable over the past ten, with the Republican Party holding a little advantage .
All major racial and ethnic voter groups lean Democratic, except Whites National exit polling data tells a like narrative to partisan designation, with White voters showing a slender and fairly consistent preference toward Republican candidates in presidential elections over the end 40 years, while Black voters have solidly supported the democratic contenders. hispanic voters have besides historically been more likely to support Democrats than republican candidates, though their support has not been deoxyadenosine monophosphate coherent as that of Black voters. These racial and ethnic groups are by no means monolithic. There is a rich diverseness of views and experiences within these groups, sometimes varying based on state of origin. For model, Pew Research Center ’ s 2018 National Survey of Latinos found that Hispanic eligible voters of Puerto Rican and/or Mexican descent – regardless of voter registration condition – were more probable than those of Cuban lineage to identify as Democrats or lean toward the democratic Party ( 65 % of Puerto Rican Americans and 59 % of mexican Americans vs. 37 % of Cuban Americans identified as Democrats ). A majority of Cuban eligible voters identified as or leaned toward the Republican Party ( 57 % ) .
Among asian American registered voters, there are besides some differences in party identification by lineage group. For exemplify, vietnamese Americans are more likely than Asians overall to identify as Republican, while the reverse is true among indian Americans, who tend to lean more democratic .
Higher voter turnout among White and Black voters in presidential elections Given these differences within racial and heathen groups, the proportional share of different origin groups within a specific state can impact the partisan leanings of that state ’ mho electorate. For example, in Florida, Republican-leaning Cubans had historically been the largest spanish american lineage group. however, over the past decade, the more Democratic-leaning Puerto Ricans have been the express ’ s fastest-growing Hispanic-origin group, and they now rival Cubans in size. At the same time, in states like California and Nevada, Mexican Americans, who tend to lean Democratic, are the dominant Hispanic beginning group.

partisan alignment does not tell the wholly narrative when it comes to voting patterns. voter turnout rates – or the share of U.S. citizens ages 18 and older who cast a vote – besides vary widely across racial and ethnic groups. White adults historically have had the highest pace of voter turnout : About two-thirds of eligible White adults ( 65 % ) voted in the 2016 election. Black adults have besides historically had relatively high rates of voter outfit, though typically slightly lower than White adults. There was an exception to this form in 2008 and 2012, when Black voter turnout matched or exceeded that of Whites. By contrast, asian and spanish american adults have had historically lower voter turnout rates, with about half report that they voted in 2016 .
White and Black adults are besides more probably than hispanic and asian adults to say that they are registered to vote .

Non-White eligible voters accounted for more than three-quarters of total U.S. electorate growth since 2000

The colored vote population has played a big function in driving increase in the nation ’ south electorate. From 2000 to 2018, the state ’ second eligible voter population grew from 193.4 million to 233.7 million – an addition of 40.3 million. Voters who are Hispanic, Black, Asian or another race or ethnicity accounted for more than three-quarters ( 76 % ) of this growth .
Most of the growth in the electorate since 2000 has come from Hispanic, Black and Asian eligible voters The substantial share point increase of voters who are not White as a plowshare of the nation ’ s overall electorate was largely driven by second-generation Americans – the U.S.-born children of immigrants – coming of age, adenine well as immigrants naturalizing and becoming eligible to vote. The increase has been firm over the past 18 years – from 2000 to 2010, their plowshare rose by 4 share points ( from 24 % to 28 % ), while from 2010 to 2018, their partake further grew by 5 points ( up from 28 % to 33 % ) .
Hispanic eligible voters were notably the largest contributors to the electorate ’ randomness rise. They alone accounted for 39 % of the overall increase of the nation ’ s eligible voting population. spanish american voters made up 13 % of the country ’ s overall electorate in 2018 – closely doubling from 7 % in 2000. The population ’ sulfur share grew steadily since 2000, with alike share point emergence observed between 2000 and 2010 ( 3 points ) and 2010 and 2018 ( 3 points ) .
The hispanic electorate ’ s growth chiefly stemmed from their U.S.-born population coming of historic period. The 12.4 million Hispanics who turned 18 between 2000 and 2018 accounted for 80 % of the increase among the population ’ s eligible voters during those years. The group ’ randomness sustained growth over the past two decades will make Hispanics the projected largest minority group among U.S. eligible voters in 2020 for the first clock in a presidential election .
asian eligible voters besides saw a meaning raise in their numbers, increasing from 4.6 million in 2000 to 10.3 million in 2018. And similar to Hispanics, their about two-decade growth has been relatively coherent. The population ’ s partake in the electorate grew at similar rates from 2000 to 2010 and from 2010 to 2018 ( 1 point each ). In 2018, Asian eligible voters made up 4 % of the state ’ randomness electorate ( up from 2 % in 2000 ), the smallest share out of all major racial and heathen groups. Naturalized immigrants – a group that makes up two-thirds of the asian american electorate – are the main driver of the asian electorate ’ s growth. From 2000 to 2018, the number of established asian immigrant voters more than doubled – from 3.3 million to 6.9 million – and their increase entirely accounted for 64 % of the overall growth in the asian electorate .
Despite celebrated emergence in the colored eligible voter population, non-Hispanic White voters still made up the large majority ( 67 % ) of the U.S. electorate in 2018. however, they saw the smallest growth pace out of all racial ethnic groups from 2000 to 2018, causing their share to shrink by closely 10 share points .

Shares of non-Hispanic White eligible voters have declined in all 50 states

The overall worsen in the shares of the non-Hispanic White eligible voter population can be observed across all states. ( There hasn ’ thymine been a descent in the District of Columbia. ) While this swerve is not new, it is playing out to varying degrees across the country, with some states experiencing particularly significant shifts in the racial and heathen writing of their electorate .
In sum between 2000 and 2018, 10 states saw a 10 percentage indicate or greater decline in the share of White eligible voters. In Nevada, the White parcel of the electorate fell 18 percentage points over about two decades, the largest dribble among all 50 states. The decline in the White share of the electorate in Nevada has been fairly steadily, with a comparable share point refuse observed between 2000 and 2010 ( 10 points ) and 2010 and 2018 ( 8 points ). California has experienced a similarly sharp decline in the White plowshare of the electorate, dropping 15 share points since 2000. This has resulted in California changing from a majority White electorate in 2000 to a country where White voters were a minority contribution of the electorate in 2018 ( 60 % in 2000 to 45 % in 2018 ), though they hush are the largest racial or heathen group in the electorate .
Latinos vote at a polling station in Los Angeles. (David McNew/Getty Images)Latinos vote at a polling station in Los Angeles. (David McNew/Getty Images)
even with declines in all 50 states, White eligible voters still make up the majority of most states ’ electorates. In 47 states, over half of eligible voters are White. The only exceptions are California, New Mexico and Hawaii, where White voters account for 45 %, 43 % and 25 % of each respective state ’ s electorate .
As reflected on the national level, Hispanic eligible voters have been the primary coil drivers of the racial and cultural diversification of most states ’ electorates. In 39 states between 2000 and 2018, Hispanic eligible voters saw the largest share item increase compared with any other racial or heathen group. In three extra states – Alaska, Kentucky and Ohio – Hispanic voters were tied with another racial group for the highest increase. Five states that observed the largest increase in hispanic shares in their electorates were California ( 11 percentage points ), Nevada ( 10 points ), Florida ( 9 points ), Arizona ( 8 points ) and Texas ( 8 points ) .
The number of Black eligible voters countrywide grew alone slightly in the past 18 years. even indeed, Black voters saw the largest percentage degree increase out of any other racial and cultural group in three states in the southeast : Georgia ( 5 points ), Delaware ( 4 points ) and Mississippi ( 4 points ) .
As for Asian eligible voters, they saw robust growth in California ( 5 percentage points ), Nevada and New Jersey ( 4 points each ) between 2000 and 2018. however, their share increases paled in comparison to the Hispanic electorate ’ s increase in those states. Overall, Asians saw their shares increase in the electorates of every state except Hawaii, where their share dropped by 4 share points. still, Hawaii has the highest percentage of Asians in its electorate – 38 % of all eligible voters in the state are asian .

Racial and ethnic change among eligible voters in battleground states

As the 2020 presidential election attract near, these demographic shifts are particularly celebrated in some key battlefield states, where changes in the composition of the electorate could have an impact on electoral outcomes .Pace of racial and ethnic change varies widely across key battleground states nationally, Florida and Arizona saw the third- and fourth-largest declines in the shares of non-Hispanic White eligible voters. The White shares of the electorate in those states each stand at about six-in-ten in 2018, down from about three-quarters at the get down of the century. Four other battlefield states – Pennsylvania, North Carolina, Wisconsin and Michigan – besides saw declines in the share of White eligible voters between 2000 and 2018, though to a lesser extent .
In Florida, a state that has been pivotal to every U.S. presidential victory in the last 20 years, the White share of the electorate has fallen 13 percentage points since 2000. At the lapp clock time, the Hispanic partake of the electorate has gone up 9 points, rising from 11 % of eligible Florida voters in 2000 to 20 % in 2018. During this same period, the Black share of the electorate in Florida has increased 2 share points and the Asian share has increased by 1 point.

Arizona, largely seen as an emerging battlefield state of matter, has seen significant change to the racial and ethnic musical composition of its electorate. spanish american adults immediately make up about one-fourth of all eligible voters ( 24 % ), an 8-point increase since 2000 .
several battlefield states have seen smaller – though hush potentially meaningful – changes to the demographic musical composition of the electorate. In Pennsylvania, the White partake of the electorate fell 7 share points while the Hispanic share of the electorate rose 3 points from 2000 to 2018. And in North Carolina, a state that voted for Donald Trump in 2016 and previously went for Barack Obama, George W. Bush and Bill Clinton, the White share of the electorate fell from 75 % in 2000 to 69 % in 2018. During the same prison term period, the Hispanic share of the electorate rose to 4 % ( astir 3 points since 2000 ) and the Black partake of the electorate rose to 22 % ( improving 1 point since 2000 ) .
Demographic changes could continue to reshape the electoral landscape in future elections. While Texas is not presently considered a battlefield state of matter, demographic shifts have led some to wonder if the department of state could become more competitive politically down the road. In 2018, three-in-ten eligible voters in Texas were spanish american – that ’ s up 8 share points since 2000. During that same fourth dimension, the partake of White eligible voters in Texas fell 12 points, from 62 % in 2000 to a bare majority ( 51 % ) in 2018 .

informant : https://coinselected.com
Category : crypto topics

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.